‘The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.‘ President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Farewell Address to the Nation, January 17, 1961
The modern Medical Establishment operates much like any Mafia type Organization or Corporation; ruthless, highly efficient & exponentially profitable. The United Nations, as it currently exists, wields more power & influence over National Health policy world-wide than that of any locally/nationally elected Government or adjunct Health Ministry, an endless feeding troth buoyed by massive (tax shelter) Private & Public investment – literally a de facto Empire or hydra, comprised of unelected, financially & ethically unaccountable Committees, managed by so called “Technocratic Elites”; which dispatches Global Health directives to 193 signatory Nations/Members signed on to the UN Charter, primarily through a centralized, self-regulating hub known as the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE). ‘Principal advisory group to WHO for vaccines and immunization (from research to delivery of immunization and linkages with other health interventions – all vaccines,all ages)…reports directly to DG (Director General of WHO) and involves all relevant WHO departments.‘.
‘The Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization was established by the Director-General of the World Health Organization in 1999 to provide guidance on the work of the WHO Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals Department. SAGE is the principal advisory group to WHO for vaccines and immunization. It is charged with advising WHO on overall global policies and strategies, ranging from vaccines and technology, research and development, to delivery of immunization and its linkages with other health interventions. SAGE is concerned not just with childhood vaccines and immunization, but all vaccine-preventable diseases‘ World (Un)Health Organization
Sage “experts” (‘appointed by the WHO Director-General to serve for an initial term of three years…may only be renewed once.‘) are hand-picked from a revolving door assembly-line of current/former CEO’S, mid level Executives of major Vaccine & Drug Manufacturing Companies, including scientific researchers with deep ties to Industry Product Research & Development, Special Interest groups, front-line veteran Pediatricians, Hospital directors etc. Representatives of Sage are uniformly mainstream in their professionally held viewpoints on Health, typically pro-vaccine, pro-drug, pro-Allopathic Medicine in general. Nowhere in the guidelines or on the board will you ever find a Naturopathic doctor or Holistic Medicine type practitioner as an official representative in Sage policy-making. ‘The SAGE comprises 15 members, who shall serve in their personal capacity and represent a broad range of disciplines encompassing many aspects of immunization and vaccines. SAGE members are recruited and selected as acknowledged experts from around the world in the fields of epidemiology, public health, vaccinology, paediatrics, internal medicine, infectious diseases, immunology, drug regulation, programme management, immunization delivery, health-care administration, health economics, and vaccine safety.‘
All essential decisions pertaining to Global Health policies & strategies, including Standard Immunization protocols & Pandemic Preparedness procedures, are coordinated through these channels; and vetted through the titular head of the Corporation – referred to as the Director-General (Dr. Margaret Chan). ‘Sage advises the WHO Director-General specifically on engagement of WHO in partnerships that will enhance achievement of global immunization goals.‘
The sell-out Corporate backed Mainstream Media machine serves as the Propaganda Wing & surrogate enforcer of the UN (in essence bound by a contractual obligation – manifesting in strict editorial censorship over controversial material which challenges the Status Quo agenda); routinely glossing over contradictory evidence that opposes or second-guesses the WHO, while fervently pushing any/all WHO Health directives & recommendations on the public-at-large; by tailoring their headlines & editorial content, specifically to persuade the “herd”, by any means at their disposal (ie. manipulation, exaggeration, intimidation, distortion, cover-ups, omission, misrepresentation, deception, lies, fear-mongering, innuendo etc etc etc), into complying with Global Immunization protocols. You will never find the MSM contradicting or second-guessing WHO policy. Journalistic integrity is denied. Media outlets around the world are coordinated in terms of content distribution.
According to the World Health Organization there are strict standards in place to assure impartiality. ‘It is expected that individuals who are qualified to serve as an expert for WHO may have private interests related to their expertise. But, at the same time, it is imperative that situations are avoided in which such interests may unduly affect, or may be perceived to affect, an expert’s impartiality.’
1. Dr Edwin J. Asturias (John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Guatemala City, Guatemala)
2. Professor Stephen Evans (Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)
3. Dr Kenneth Hartigan-Go (Executive Director, Zuellig Foundation, Makati City, Philippines)
4. Professor Gregory Hussey (South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa)
5. Professor Paul-Henri Lambert – Chairman of Sage board (Center of Vaccinology, Department of Pathology, Centre Médical Universitaire, Geneva, Switzerland)
– Committee chief/Lecturer at annual International Vaccine Institute Advanced Course on Vaccinoloy sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – & Rockefeller Foundation, World Health Organization; also a Member of Scientific Advisory Board at ‘DBV Technologies ‘developing the ‘proprietary, patented VIASKIN® epicutaneous delivery technology primarily for the diagnosis and treatment of allergies and mass vaccination.’
6. Dr Karen Midthun (Deputy Director for Medicine, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America)
7. Professor Mrudula A. Phadke – Vice-Chancellor, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Maharashtra, India
– Vice-Chancellor of Nashik, India-based Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (MUHS), awarded $50,000 (12/19/08) by United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in a collaboration ‘aimed at developing new scientific knowledge, creating new technology for the development of vaccines, drugs, diagnostic tools and devices’
8. Dr Hanna Nohynek (Senior Scientist, KTL National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland)
– Scientific project coordinator of the ARIVAC trial, a phase III study of an 11-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine being conducted by the international ARIVAC consortium on the island of Bohol in the Philippines. The study is funded by the European Commission DG Research INCO programme, Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Programme at PATH, the Finnish Academy and the Finnish Foreign Ministry, and WHO Vaccines and Biologicals.
9. Dr Stefania Salmaso (Director, National Centre for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion, Instituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy)
– Member of ‘The Global Pertussis Initiative’ (GPI), overseeing ‘New Pertussis Vaccination Strategies beyond Infancy’ funded through an unrestricted educational grant provided by Aventis Pasteur SA and Aventis Pasteur MSD SNC
10. Professor Heinz-J. Schmitt (Zentrum für Präventive Pädiatrie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany)
11. Professor Michal Schwartz (Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel)
12. Professor Peter Smith (Infectious Disease Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)
Serves on a number of advisory committees of the World Health Organisation and of the UK Government; spearheaded numerous Pro-vaccine studies emphasizing an improved ‘case-control’ approach to evaluate ‘adverse effects’ of vaccines…’Our findings suggest that MMR vaccination is not associated with an increased risk of pervasive developmental disorders.’
There is simply no way to ensure impartiality of Sage membership, given so many hands in so many Industry pockets, long-term commitments & contracts which inherently demand a vested interest, and fundamental belief in the benefits of Mainstream Medicine. The WHO has obviously stacked the deck on one side to push forward their dark agenda, and will forever ignore the growing voices of dissent, a groundswell surging of communities from around the world, which have finally woken up collectively and begun to reclaim their inherent rights to self-determination of the body.